18 thoughts on “Soup, No Bowl

  1. “I am sluggish for want of power; my examination of the room has taken .8 seconds.” – “Combat Unit”, Keith Laumer, 1960(?)

        1. A year on….

          A google search of soup: no bowl turns up this post.

          In all of human history includes, perhaps paradoxically, this discourse.

          The Replicator now knows, from the comments, that soup: no bowl is Cup o’Noodles, or soup in a mug.

          Media chomp commenters have saved the Starship Enterprise.

    1. Indeed, “soup, no bowl” is a thing. Cook broth down to a gluey, gelatinous sheet. Cut into cakes, wrap and store. The Royal Navy issued it as food for invalids. I’m not sure what the average Federation crew would think of it though. Most naval fiction portrays it as a bit of a joke.

  2. Soup is adapted from sop, which is broth ladled over a slice of bread, It doesn’t require a bowl, although it would still be wiser to eat it in one. The replicators would probably just give a failure error and lack the capacity to try to fulfil the request. There was a Cardassian stowaway on DS9 who had to hack a replicator in the residential area at night to get it to combine human food ingredients into something she could eat. Replicators seem to be independent, self-contained appiances

  3. I think the answer is obvious. It replicates the soup, but also turns off the gravity on that deck. A blob of soup floats out of the replicator, as surprised crew members suddenly flail about, trying to find something the hold onto.

  4. I just thought it would flood the ship. Another part of the rule set should say liquids fill their container. No bowl means the ship is the container.

Leave a Comment